SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MARK RAJANDRAN VS. FIRST CAPITAL LTD. FORMERLY COMMERCIAL CAPITAL LTD.


MARK RAJANDRAN VS. FIRST CAPITAL LTD., FORMERLY,COMMERCIAL CAPITAL LTD.

MARK RAJANDRAN VS. FIRST CAPITAL LTD., FORMERLY,
COMMERCIAL CAPITAL LTD.,

SUPREME COURT
DR. SHIRANI BANDARANAYAKE, ACTING C. J.
RATNAYAKE, J., AND
EKANAYAKE, J.
S. C. H. C. (C. A.) LA NO. 289/2009
WP/HCCA/COL. NO. 67/2007 (F)
D. C. COLOMBO NO. 17543/MR
JUNE 7TH,2010

Oaths and Affirmations Ordinance - Section 4 - provisions as to how an oath should be given - Section 5 - only exemption to Section 4 - Supreme Court Rules - Rule 2 - every- application for special leave to appeal should be made by way of petition & affidavit - Rule 6 - an application contains allegation of facts which cannot be verified by reference to the judgment or order of the Lower Court in respect of which, leave is sought, should the petitioner annex in support of such allegation an affidavit?

The petitioner preferred an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court from a judgment of the Provincial High Court of the Western Province (Sitting in Colombo).

When the matter was taken up for support the respondent took up a preliminary objection to the affidavit filed by the petit








































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top