SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LOKUHENNADIGE VS. LT. GENERAL SARATH FONSEKA AND OTHERS


LOKUHENNADIGE VS. LT. GENERAL SARATH FONSEKA AND OTHERS

LOKUHENNADIGE VS. LT. GENERAL SARATH FONSEKA
AND OTHERS

COURT OF APPEAL
SRISKANDARAJAH, J.
CA 1274/2006
MARCH 12, 2009

Army Act - Section 27 (d) - Court of Inquiry - Disqualification to be a member of the Court of Inquiry - Power to deduct sum ordered from pay or allowance - Validity - Judicial Review - appeals - Difference - Withdrawing of commission -Dismissed from Army - Can punishment be imposed without holding inquiry? Punishment - Surcharge is it a punishment?

On an investigation by Military Police into an "air ticket fraudn the petitioner a Captain in the Army was taken into custody, a Court of Inquiry inquired into the incident and recommended that the respondent should recover from the petitioner and two others, the said sum, to take disciplinary action against those who were found responsible, and to take steps to withdraw the commission and to dismiss the 3 officers. It was contended that, the 3'd respondent was disqualified to sit as a member of the Court of Inquiry - as he was a beneficiary of a ticket obtained from the Directorate as he is witness to the transactions and that the 6th respondent did not p


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top