SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THlRlMAVlTHANA VS. URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS


THlRlMAVlTHANA VS. URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS

THlRlMAVlTHANA VS. URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AND OTHERS

COURT OF APPEAL
SRIPAVAN, J.
SISIRA DE ABREW, J.
CA 378/2005
NOVEMBER 14,2005
JANUARY 25,2006
MAY 8, 10, 15, 16, 17, 23, 25,26,29,2006
JUNE 1,6, 15,27,2006
SEPTEMBER 6,2006

Writ of Certiorari- Acquisition of Land reserved for play ground / recreational activities for residents - possession taken over - under unlawful arbitrary capricious? - Urban Development Authority law (UDA) law of 41 of 1978 as  amended - Section 18(1). Alienation of UDA land - is the approval of the minister necessary? Availability of judicial review - failure to follow procedure laid down in law - total? - legitimate Expectation - to have the ground kept as a play ground? change of promise - overriding public interest?

The petitioners are the owners/residents/ occupiers of the houses situated within the Jayanthipuara Housing Scheme - 65 Acres. The Land was originally divided amongst the original owners and a block of land of about 5 Acres 3 Roods was identified as open space. A portion of this area - in extent one Acre had been used as a playground and for recreational activi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top