SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PEIRIS AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
SIRIPALA – Respondent


New Page 1

PEIRIS AND ANOTHER
vs
SIRIPALA

COURT OF APPEAL
RANJITH SILVA. J
SALAM. J
CA49/2001(F)
DC HOMAGAMA 1798/CD
FEBRUARY 2, 2009
MAY 6, 21, 2009

Declaration - Deed void -fraudulent - Civil Procedure Code Section 35(1) -Joining of causes of action without leave of Court-Fraud alleged-Corroboration necessary?-Burden of proving fraud-Beyond reasonable doubt or balance of probability? Non est factum?

The plaintiff-respondent instituted action seeking a declaration that the deed of transfer 4881 - be declared void on the basis that the defendant-appellants have unlawfully and fraudulently manipulated the transfer of the entire land to the Is1 appellant. The trial Judge held in favour of the plaintiff-respondent.

It was contended by the defendant-appellant that the cause of action to have the impugned deed declared null and void cannot be joined with a cause of action for a declaration of title to the immovable property without leave of Court first had and obtained.

Held:

(1) The plaintiff respondent in the issues raised had confined himself to have the impugned deed set aside and had not proceeded to raise an issue with regard to declaratio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top