FRANCIS SAMARAWICKREMA – Appellant
Versus
HILDA JAYASINGHE AND ANOTHER – Respondent
FRANCIS SAMARAWICKREMA
VS
HILDA JAYASINGHE AND ANOTHER
SUPREME COURT
SARATH N. SILVA, C. J.
SHIRANEE TILAKAWARDANE, J. AND
SALEEM MARSOOF.
S. C. APPEAL NO.7 /2004
S. C. SPECIAL L. A. NO. 111/2003
C. A. NO. 388/93(F)
D. C. KALUTARA NO. 2443/L
OCTOBER 24TH, 2006,
JUNE 21ST 2006,
JULY 4TH 2006,
SEPTEMBER 21ST 2006
MARCH 15TH 2007
Prevention of Frauds Ordinance - Section 2 - Any contract for the sale or
other disposition of land or any interest in the land is invalid unless in
writing and signed in the presence of a Notary Public and two or more witnesses
- Evidence Ordinance - Section 68 - proof of execution of document required to
be attested - Section 33, Section 101, Section 102, Section 103 - Evidence in a
former judicial proceedings when relevant - Section 3 - Definition of proved and
disproved - Standard of proof - Criminal and Civil.
The plaintiff-respondent-appellant filed this action in the District Court of
Kalutara on 24th November 1976 against the 1st and 2nd
defendant-appellants- respondents. The case first went to trial on 1st March
1978, and after trial the District Judge pronounced the judgment for the
appellant as prayed for in the plaint
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.