KANAPATHIPILLI VS. SRI LANKA BROADCASTING CORPORATION AND OTHERS
KANAPATHIPILLI VS. SRI LANKA
BROADCASTING
CORPORATION AND OTHERS
SUPREME COURT
DR. SHIRANI BANDARANAYAKE. J.
AMARATUNAGAJ.
BALAPATABENDI. J.
SC 145/2007
DECEMBER 4. 2008
JANUARY 22,2009
Constitution - Art 12 (1), 17, 126 - Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to
grant reliefs or give directions. Concept of equality - equals and unequals.
The petitioner programme producer
of the 1st respondent Corporation alleged that the appointment of the 4th
respondent to the post of Director Tamil Service was illegal and thereby had
violated Art 12(1) of the Contitution. It was the contention of the petitioner
that the 4th respondent was disqualified from being re-employed in the public
service in terms of Administrative Circular 44/90, and that out of the eligible
candidates he had scored the highest marks.
The respondent contended that, the Corporation was unaware of the circumstances
of the 4th respondent's retirement from public service and that the interviews
were held over two years ago and a long duration of time had passed since the
holding of the said interview, and that the petitioner had obtained only 42
marks out of hundred which does not reflect
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.