SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bonser, CJ
SIYADORIS – Appellant
Versus
GUNAWARDENA et al. . – Respondent


Advocates:
Dornhorst, for appellants.
Jayewardene, for respondent.

SIYADORIS v. GUNAWARDENA et al.

SIYADORIS v. GUNAWARDENA et al.

P. C., Galle, No. 18,082.'

 

Criminal procedure-Inquiry into complaint for offences beyond and within summary jurisdiction of Magistrate-Procedure to be followed.

When a Magistrate is inquiring into a complaint containing offences both beyond and within his summary jurisdiction, and, - after evidence is recorded, comes to the conclusion that the offence beyond his jurisdiction is not made out, he should discharge the accused from the graver offence and formally record that discharge before calling on him to answer to a charge of the offence within his jurisdiction and proceeding to the trial of that charge.

THE complainant, in his plaint, charged the accused with unlawful assembly and riot, and further charged the third and fourteenth accused with theft of a panda boat of the value of Rs. 150. The magistrate took evidence, framed a charge under section 140 of the Ceylon Penal Code against all the accused for being members of an unlawful assembly, and convicted them of that offence. The accused appealed.

Dornhorst, for appellants.

Jayewardene, for respondent.

11th October, 1895. Bonser, C.J.-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top