SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MEEDIN v. KIMHATANA et al.


MEEDIN v. KIMHATANA et al.

MEEDIN v. KIMHATANA et al.

D. C. (Criminal), Kegalla, 869.

Ceylon Penal Code, s. 67-Offence made up of part.*, each being itself an offence-Conviction of accused of such offence.

A breaks into a dwelling house at night and steals some property therefrom. His conviction both of house-breaking by night, in order to the commission of an offence punishable with imprisonment and of theft from a building used as a human dwelling would be obnoxious to section 67* of the Ceylon Penal Code.

IN this case the accused, two in number, were charged (I) with house-breaking by night in order to the committing of an offence punishable with imprisonment-to wit, theft, an offence punishable under section 443 of the Ceylon Penal Code; and (2) with theft from a building used as a human dwelling, an offence punishable under section 369 of the Ceylon Penal Code. The. evidence showed that in the night of the 18th April, 1896, the accused broke into the house of one Mohidin and stole there from certain crockery, a teapot, a knife, and a bag containing 2,000 are canuts. The District Judge convicted the accused of both the offences with which they were cha





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top