Bonser, CJ
CASSIM et al. – Appellant
Versus
PERIA TAMBY et al. – Respondent
CASSIM et al. v. PERIA TAMBY et al.
D. C., Matara, 1, 048,
Charter of 1801, clause 32-Mohammedan Law-Witt, construction of.
The will of a person falling under the designation " Mussulman native, " as used in the Charter of 1801, must be construed, not according to the Roman-Dutch Law, but according to the laws and usages of the Mussulmans, as provided by clause 32 of that Charter.
THE facts of the case appear in the judgment of Bonser, C. J.
Layard, A. -G., for appellants.
Darnhorst, with Wendt, for respondents.
15th September, 1896. Bonser, C. J. -
This is an action to recover an undivided moiety of a garden situated at Matara, which was bequeathed by the will of the testator who died in 1826. The testator appears to have had two children then living, a daughter who was betrothed, and being of tender years not given in marriage to her husband, and also a son, " who was also of tender years. The testator by his will gave certain charitable and other legacies and annuities.
With respect to certain immovable property, which was specified in a certain schedule appended to the will, he directed that his nephew, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.