SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bonser, CJ
CASSIM et al. – Appellant
Versus
PERIA TAMBY et al. – Respondent


Advocates:
Layard, A. -G., for appellants.
Darnhorst, with Wendt, for respondents.

CASSIM et al. v. PERIA TAMBY et al.

CASSIM et al. v. PERIA TAMBY et al.

D. C., Matara, 1, 048,

 

Charter of 1801, clause 32-Mohammedan Law-Witt, construction of.

The will of a person falling under the designation " Mussulman native, " as used in the Charter of 1801, must be construed, not according to the Roman-Dutch Law, but according to the laws and usages of the Mussulmans, as provided by clause 32 of that Charter.

THE facts of the case appear in the judgment of Bonser, C. J.

Layard, A. -G., for appellants.

Darnhorst, with Wendt, for respondents.

15th September, 1896. Bonser, C. J. -

This is an action to recover an undivided moiety of a garden situated at Matara, which was bequeathed by the will of the testator who died in 1826. The testator appears to have had two children then living, a daughter who was betrothed, and being of tender years not given in marriage to her husband, and also a son, " who was also of tender years. The testator by his will gave certain charitable and other legacies and annuities.

With respect to certain immovable property, which was specified in a certain schedule appended to the will, he directed that his nephew, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top