SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ENDORIS v. HAMINE


ENDORIS v. HAMINE

ENDORIS v. HAMINE

C. R., Balapitiya, 1,414.


Civil Procedure Code, ss. 247 and 48
-Date of institution of action- Return of plaint for amendment-Rejection of plaint-What facts to be specified by Judge in his order returning plaint for amendment. Where a plaint, presented within the time prescribed for the institution of an action under section 247 of the Civil Procedure Code, was returned for amendment, and was presented again duly amended, after the period of fourteen days from the time of the first presentation had expired-Held, on objection, that the action was not instituted too late.

When a Judge declines to entertain a plaint and returns it for amendment, he must make an order specifying the date when the plaint was presented, the name of the person by whom it was presented, whether such person was the plaintiff in person or a proctor, and the fault or defect constituting the ground of the return; and every such endorsement must be signed by the Judge and filed of record.

Semble, per Bonser, C.J.--When a plaint is rejected and a fresh plaint has to be filed, the institution of the action must be dated the day on which the new plaint is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top