SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE QUEEN v. ERERA


THE QUEEN v. PERERA.

THE QUEEN v. PERERA.

D. C. (Crim.), Colombo, 1,488/44,279.

 

Using as genuine a forged valuable security-District Court-Jurisdiction-Ceylon Penal Code, ss. 456, 459, and 392-Ordinance 1 of 1888, 8. 11.

Under section 11of Ordinance No. 1 of 1888, District Courts have jurisdiction to try the offence of uttering all forged documents in the nature of valuable securities knowing the same to be forged, although the offence of forging such documents is triable only by the Supreme Court.

THE accused, who was clerk and interpreter of the Itinerating Police Magistrate, Western Province, was charged (1) with fraudulently and dishonestly using as genuine a forged document purporting to be a valuable security, knowing the same to be forged, an offence punishable under sections 456 and 459 of the Ceylon Penal Code; and (2) with criminal breach of trust as a public servant, an offence under section 392 of the Penal Code.

At the trial the accused's counsel took objection to the jurisdiction of the District Court on the ground that the offence laid in the indictment was abetment under section 459 of forgery of a document of the class mentioned in sec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top