SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PERERA v. WHITE


PERERA v. WHITE.

PERERA v. WHITE.

D. C., Colombo, 14,093.

Advocate and client-Retainer and fee-Application to Supreme Court to apportion counsel to advise applicant in conduct of his case-Refusal of counsel to take up a case,

A retainer given to an advocate in a case means that he is to hold himself ready to accept a brief with a fee.

If the retainer is not followed by a brief and fee, the counsel is at liberty to appear on the other side upon retainer and fee.

An advocate cannot decline a fee capriciously.

If a party to a litigation should retain the whole roll of advocates, so as to leave his opponent without the advice and aid of counsel, it would amount to a public scandal, and the Supreme Court would feel justified in interfering to apportion advocates to, such party.

But where a plaintiff has retained several advocates, and there are other members of the bar of standing and position who have not been applied to by the defendant,

Held, on motion made by the defendant to apportion counsel to advise him in his defence, that the Supreme Court had no reason to interfere.

ON the 10th October, 1900, Elliott appeared for the defendant, Mr. Herbert White, the Acti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top