SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LETCHEMANAN v. CHRISTIAN.


LETCHEMANAN v. CHRISTIAN.

LETCHEMANAN v. CHRISTIAN.

D. C., Galle, 3,533,

Proctor and client-Proctor giving proxy to another proctor to appear in the case-Rights of proctor-Civil Procedure Code, s. 27, form 7.

No proctor is entitled to appear for a client unless he has a proxy signed by such client; and there cannot be more than one proctor at the same time on the record.

Nor can one proctor employ another proctor to appear for him and conduct a case,

A proxy to that effect should not be received in Court.

If the proctor appointed by a client does not wish to conduct the case himself, he is at liberty to employ an advocate.

The form of proxy No. 7 given under section 27 of the Civil Procedure Code, so far as it refers to one proctor appointing another proctor in a case, is not justified by that section of the Code.

ACTION on a promissory note against two defendants who were the makers of it. The second defendant engaged Mr. N. D. Abeyesingha as his proctor and granted him a proxy dated 18th April 1895, on the strength of which he appeared for him, before the District Court on the 22nd April of that year. Judgment was entered up against first defendant on the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top