SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GOVERNMENT AGENT NORTHERN PROVINCE v. PARARAJA


GOVERNMENT AGENT, NORTHERN PROVINCE, v. PARARAJASINGHAM.

GOVERNMENT AGENT, NORTHERN PROVINCE,

v. PARARAJASINGHAM.

D. C., Jaffna, 2,467.

Hindu temple-Acquisition of glebe land for public purpose-Price brought into Court by Government Agent in land acquisition case-Claims to trusteeship of temple-Duty of Court to see that price is not expended for mere temporary purposes.

Where money was brought into Court as the value of a land which belonged to a Hindu temple and had been acquired by the Government under the Land Acquisition Ordinance, and several parties claimed the proceeds, each alleging himself to be a trustee of the temple,-

Held, that the question of trusteeship of the temple should be settled in the very case in which the money was brought into Court, and that if paid out, the Court should take care that the money, representing the value of glebe land, was not expended for mere temporary purposes, but in some way that will permanently benefit the charity.

IN this case the issue was, which of the defendants were entitled to draw the money brought into Court by the plaintiff as the value of the land acquired by the Government under the Land Acquisition Or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top