SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ANNMALAI PILLAI v. PERERA SUPPRAMANIAN CHETTY ADDED PARTY


ANNAMALAI PILLAI v. PERERA. Suppramanian Chetty, Added Party

ANNAMALAI PILLAI v. PERERA.

Suppramanian Chetty, Added Party, Appellant.

D. C, Negombo, 4,072.

Partition Ordinance, No. 10 of 1863, s. 17-Alienation of land during pendency of proceedings for partition.

E P having instituted a partition suit in the District Court of Colombo in respect of several lands, her share of one of the lands sought to be partitioned was seized on a writ of execution against her and sold on. 23rd July, 1898, to M S, who sold it to A P on 11th September, 1899. On 29th October, 1899, the District Judge of Colombo ordered that the land in question should be struck out of the partition suit, which was still pending. E P then sold to S C on 8th January, 1901, the half share which had been previously sold by the Fiscal to M S.

In an action for partition of this land brought in the District Court of Negombo by A P, who claimed to be the owner of one-half thereof under M S,-

Held, per Moncreiff, A.C.J., and Middleton, J. (Wandt, J., dissenting), that the Fiscal's transfer to M S and M S's transfer to A P were not only void quoad the partition suit raised in the District Court of Colombo,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top