SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ELSTONE v. MARTELIS APPU


ELSTONE v. MARTELIS APPU.

ELSTONE v. MARTELIS APPU.

M. C. Colombo, 28.

Unlawful gaming-Ordinance No. 17 of 1889, s. 4-Playing in any place to which the public have access whether of right or not-Private land.

An open cocoanut plantation crossed by several paths which did not appear to lead from one house to another in it, nor from the adjoining roads to any of the houses in the plantation, and in which a game for a stake was carried on by divers persons, is a place to which the public have access whether of right or not.

The fact that such plantation is private land does not exclude it from the purview of section i of the Ordinance No. 17 of 1889. Perera v. Perera (2 C. L. R. 6) overruled.

THIS case of unlawful gaining, in which the Magistrate of the Municipal Court of Colombo (Mr. E. Ondatje) acquitted the accused, was heard in appeal by Mr. Justice Middleton on 7th May, 1903, when His Lordship, being doubtful of the soundness of the decision of Burnside, C.J., in Perera v. Perera (2 C. L. R. 6), on which the Magistrate had based his judgment of acquittal, directed the case to be listed before the Collective Court.

On the 18th May the case was argued before Lay

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top