SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SILVA v. SINNO APPU


SILVA v. SINNO APPU.

SILVA v. SINNO APPU.

C.R.Galle, 1,611.

PosProssessory action by part-owner-Civil Procedure Code, s. 12-Ordinance No. 22 of 1871, s. 2.

   The owner of an undivided share of land can maintain a possessory action in respect of such share, provided he joins the other co-owners as parties either plaintiff or defendant.

D. C... Chilaw, 261 (i S. C. R. 329), distinguished.

    IN this possessory suit plaintiff pleaded possession for over a year and a day previous to the ouster complained of, and prayed for ejectment of the defendant. He alleged that he was entitled under a purchase in execution to an undivided half part of Higgahawatta, and that the defendants, who had no title or interest in that share or any other share of the land, forcibly opened a road on the said land, took possession of it, and deprived him of the produce there of.

    The District Judge dismissed the action on the ground that plaintiff could not maintain such an action. He held that as the second defendant claimed to be a co-owner, the plaintiff should have instituted an action rei vindicatio.

    The plaintiff appealed. The case was argued on 5th June, 1903.

   Wal





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top