SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUPPRAMANIYAM CHETTY v. GABRIEL FERNANDO


SERAHAMY v. RANKIRA.

SUPPRAMANIAM CHETTY v. GABRIEL FERNANDO.

D. C, Negombo, 2,805.

Surety in legal proceedings-Procedure for forfeiture of bond and recovery of the amount-Rule to show cause.

Where a person has bound himself as a surety for the performance by a party to a legal proceeding of a judgment or order in such proceeding, he may be proceeded against in the same proceeding for forfeiture of his bond and recovery of the amount thereof; but he must, in the first instance, be noticed to show cause why the bond should not be declared forfeited and the amount should not be recovered from him.

THE defendant in this case was arrested on a writ against his person on 19th April, 1903, and committed to jail on 6th May, 1903. He appealed, and was allowed to stand out on bail, having entered into a bond jointly with one Sebastian Fernando. The bond ran as follows: " Know all men by these presents that we Gabriel Fernando and Sebastian Fernando of Otarawadiya are jointly and severally held and firmly bound to the Secretary of the said (i.e., District) Court in the sum of Rs. 1,000, for the payment of which we bind ourselves jointly and severally, our respecti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top