SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE SANITARY OFFICER v. FERNANDO


THE SANITARY OFFICER v. FERNANDO.

Present: Mr. Justice Wood Renton.

THE SANITARY OFFICER v. FERNANDO.

M. C., Colombo, 1,448.

Neglecting to keep clean road and drain in front of premises-employe" of  owner-Police Ordinance (No. 16 of 1865) s. 94-Implied repeal- Municipal Councils' Ordinance (No. 7 of 1887), ss. 170 and 171.

Held by WOOD RENTON J.-

(1) That the provisions of section 94 of Ordinance No. 16 of 1865 in respect of streets must be considered to be impliedly repealed by sections 170 and 171 of the Municipal Councils' Ordinance (No. 7 of 1887) in so far as the Municipality of Colombo is concerned.

(2) That a mere employe of the real owner cannot be said to be the " occupier " or the " inhabitant," within the meaning of Ordinance No. 16 of 1885, of the premises on which he works and therefore cannot be convicted under the above section of the Ordinance,

APPEAL from a conviction under section 94 of Ordinance No. 16 of 1865. The facts sufficiently appear in the judgment.

Sampayo, for appellant

Bawa, for respondent.

22nd March, 1906. WOOD RENTON J.-

The appellant has been convicted by the Municipal Magistrate, Colombo, under section 94 of " The P





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top