SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KULENDOEVELOE v. KANDEPERUMAL


KULENDOEVELOE v. KANDEPERUMAL.

Present: Sir Charles Peter Layard, Chief Justice, and
Mr. Justice Grenier.

KULENDOEVELOE v. KANDEPERUMAL.

D. C., Batticaloa, 2,496.

Claim by administrator-Prescription-English law of Executors and Administrators-3 and 4 William IV., c. 27, s. 6-Ordinance No. 22 of 1871.

In Ceylon prescription begins to run against an administrator claiming property on behalf of the estate from the date of the grant of letters of administration and not from the date of the death of
the intestate.

Statute 3 and i William IV., c. 27, s. 6, is not in force in Ceylon.

THE facts and arguments sufficiently appear in the judgment of Layard C.J.

Walter Pereira, K.C. (with him Tambimuttu), for the defendant, appellant.

Bawa (with him Wadsworth), for the plaintiff, respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

19th May, 1905. LAYARD C.J-

In this case the appellant's counsel points out that the plaint alleges that in the month of September, 1895, shortly after the death of the plaintiff's intestate, the defendant took wrongful possession of certain property belonging to the intestate's estate, and that the administrator of the intestate's estate did not bring this action

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top