SEGOE MOHIDEEN v. ISMAIL LEBBE MARICAR
Present : The
Hon. Mr. A. G. Lascelles, Acting Chief
Justice, and Mr. Justice Wendt.
SEGOE MOHIDEEN v. ISMAIL LEBBE MARICAR.
D. C, Colombo, 21,973.
Heir ab intestato, possession by-Appointment of administrator-Prescription-Sale by administrator-Title-" Adverse possession "- Ordinance No. 28 of 1871, s. 3.
Held, that
possession by heirs succeeding ab intestato is, always, a possession subject to
the title of a legal representative, if one should be appointed; but that it is
competent for an heir, after the appointment of an administrator, by overt acts
to change the character of his possession into an " adverse " one.
Held, also, that the onus is on the heir, in such a case, to prove when, and
how, his subordinate and derivative possession became converted into an "
adverse " one; and that the mere enjoyment) of the rents and profits, or the
erection of buildings, or the making of other improvements, would not amount to
proof of such " adverse " possession, as such acts are not inconsistent with
possession as an heir only.
ACTION rei vindicatio.
One Casie Lebbe, being owner of the premises in dispute, died intesta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.