SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SEGOE MOHIDEEN v. ISMAIL LEBBE MARICAR


Segoe Mohideen V. Ismail Lebbe Maricar

Present : The Hon. Mr. A. G. Lascelles, Acting Chief
Justice, and Mr. Justice Wendt.
 

SEGOE MOHIDEEN v. ISMAIL LEBBE MARICAR.

D. C, Colombo, 21,973.

Heir ab intestato, possession by-Appointment of administrator-Prescription-Sale by administrator-Title-" Adverse possession "- Ordinance No. 28 of 1871, s. 3.

    Held, that possession by heirs succeeding ab intestato is, always, a possession subject to the title of a legal representative, if one should be appointed; but that it is competent for an heir, after the appointment of an administrator, by overt acts to change the character of his possession into an " adverse " one.

Held, also, that the onus is on the heir, in such a case, to prove when, and how, his subordinate and derivative possession became converted into an " adverse " one; and that the mere enjoyment) of the rents and profits, or the erection of buildings, or the making of other improvements, would not amount to proof of such " adverse " possession, as such acts are not inconsistent with possession as an heir only.

ACTION rei vindicatio.

One Casie Lebbe, being owner of the premises in dispute, died intesta



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top