RATWATTE v. DULLEWE
[Full Bench.]
Present : The Hon. Sir Joseph T. Hutehinson, Chief Justice,
Mr. Justice Middleton, and Mr. Justice Wood Renton.
RATWATTE v. DULLEWE.
D. C, Kandy, 17,701.
Vendor and vendee-Liability of vendor to put vendee in vacant possession -Delivery of deed-Insufficiency-Failure to deliver possession- Cancellation of sale-Refund of purchase money.
Apart from any express agreement, a vendor of immovable property is bound to deliver vacant possession (i.e., possession unmolested by the claim of any other person in possession) of the property sold to the vendee; on his failure to do so, the vendee is entitled to a rescission of the sale and a refund of the purchase money.
The vendee is not obliged, in such circumstances, to sue the party in possession before proceeding against his vendor. A vendee of immovable property is not bound to accept delivery of the deed of transfer as sufficient delivery of possession of the property; he is entitled to ask his vendor to place him in actual possession.
Where the question is between a purchaser and a third party, the delivery of the deed of transfer is sufficient to entitle the pu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.