SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LETCHIMANEN CHETTY v. MUTTUSAMY PILLAI


LETCHIMANEN CHETTY v. MUTTUSAMY PILLAI.

 

Present: The Hon.  Sir Joseph T.  Hutchinson,  Chief Justice,

and Mr. Justice Middleton.

 

LETCHIMANEN CHETTY v.  MUTTUSAMY PILLAI.

 

D. C., Colombo, 25,257.

 

    Seizure by Fiscal-Property already in his custody under another writ- What amounts to seizure under another writ-Action under s. 247, Civil Procedure Code-Purchase pending seizure-Invalidity- Civil   Procedure   Code,   ss.   236,   241,   247,   657,   659,   660,   661.

 

Where at the instance of the plaintiff in a case the Fiscal had taken into his custody certain movable property on a mandate of sequestration issued against the property of the defendant in the case, and, where pending such sequestration, another judgment-creditor of the same defendant placed in the hands of the Fiscal a writ against the said defendant's property with a request to seize the sequestered  goods,-

 

Held, that the placing of the writ of execution in the hands of the Fiscal ipso facto amounted, in the circumstances, to a valid seizure of the goods, and a sale of the goods after that by the judgment-debtor was void as against such seizure, under section 236 of

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top