LETCHIMANEN CHETTY v. ABDUL RAHIMAN ex parte MUTTUSAMY PILLAI
Present: The Hon. Sir Joseph T. Hutchinson, Chief Justice,
and Mr. Justice Wendt.
LETCHIMANEN CHETTY v. ABDUL RAHIMAN.
Ex parte MUTTUSAMY PILLAI, Appellant.
D. C., Colombo, 24,694.
Sequestration of goods by one creditor-Application to sell by another creditor-Rights of party sequestering the goods-Civil Procedure Code, ss. 653 and 660.
Where goods belonging to a debtor are sequestered under a mandate of sequestration issued under section 653 of the Civil Procedure Code, any other judgment-creditor of the debtor, who has obtained judgment before or after such sequestration, is entitled to have the said goods sold in execution of his decree.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Acting District Judge of Colombo (F. R. Dias, Esq.) refusing to order the sale by the Fiscal of certain goods.
Bawa (with him H. A. Jayewardene), for the applicant, appellant.
Sampayo, K. C. (with him F. M. de Saram), for the plaintiff, respondent.
Van Langenberg, for the defendant.
Cur adv. vult.
April 16, 1908. HUTCHINSON C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.