PALANIAPPA CHETTY v. GOMES
Present: Mr. Justice Wendt and Mr. Justice Wood Renton.
PALANIAPPA CHETTY v. GOMES et al.
D. C., Kalutara, 3,697.
Res judicata-Dismissal of action for failure to give security for costs- Bar
to fresh action-Civil Procedure Code, ss. 207, 417, and 418.
Where a plaintiff is ordered, under section 417
of the Civil Procedure Code, to give security for costs, on the ground of the
non-residence of the defendant within the jurisdiction of the Court, and he
fails to do so, and his action is dismissed under section 418, the order of
dismissal operates as res judicata, and bars a fresh action on the same
cause of action.
Hariram Mohanji v. Lalbai1 distinguished.
APPEAL by the first defendant from a judgment of the District Judge of Kalutara (P. E. Pieris, Esq.). The facts and arguments sufficiently appear in the judgments.
Bawa, for the first defendant, appellant.
H. Jayewardene (with him C. de Jong), for the plaintiff, respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
September 14, 1908. WENDT J.-
This question in this case is whether the dismissal under section 418 of the Civil Pro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.