SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JUSTINA v. ARMAN


Justina V. Arman

Present: Mr. Justice Middleton and Mr, Justice Wood Renton.

ANNA PERERA v. EMALIANO NONIS.

P. C., Colombo, 24, 000.

JUSTINA v. ARMAN.

P. C., Galle, 44, 050.

Maintenance Ordinance (No. 19 of 1889)-Nature of proceedings-Civil liability-Plea of autrefois acquit-Plea of res judicata- Renewal of application-Criminal Procedure Code, how far applicable-English Law-Roman-Dutch Law.

Held, that where an application for maintenance under Ordinance. No. 19 of 1889 is struck out without any inquiry into the merits, the applicant has no right of appeal under section 17 of the Ordinance, but may make a fresh application, provided the time limit prescribed by section 7 has not expired.

Held, also, that the failure to maintain a wife and children is not an offence under the law of Ceylon, and no plea of autrefois acquit can be set up by a defendant who has successfully resisted proceedings under Ordinance No. 19 of 1889.

Held, further, that only those sections of the Criminal Procedure Code which are expressly incorporated in Ordinance No. 19 of 1889, are applicable to proceedings under that Ordinance, and that the provisions of section 194 of the Criminal Proc







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top