SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. ABE SEKERA


King V. Abeysekera

[FULL Bench. ]

Present: The Hon. Sir Joseph T. Hutchinson, Chief Justice,
Mr. Justice Middleton, and Mr. Justice Grenier.

THE KING v. ABEYSEKERA.

D. C. (Crim.), Kegalla, 1, 562.

Deed of gift-Stamp duty-Ordinance No. 3 of 1890, s. 23-Ordinance No. 1 of 1907. s. 29. A deed of gift of land must bear an ad valorem stamp.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Judge of Kegalla. In this case the accused, a notary public, was charged under section 23 of Ordinance No. 3 of 1890 with having executed a deed of gift without having duly stamped it; and under section 29 of Ordinance No. 1 of 1907. with having permitted one Ekneligoda to

1 16 S. C. 368 (Nathan, vol. III., p. 1700).

execute the said deed, which was insufficiently stamped. The deed of gift in question bore a stamp of Rs. 10, and was not stamped according to the value of the land transferred by it. The learned  District Judge convicted the accused on both counts. He appealed.

Bawa (with him Batuwantudawa), for the appellant. -As this deed takes effect after the death of the person executing it, it amounts to a will, and requires no stamp. [C. J. -It takes effect immediately- on the executio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top