SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SOCKALINGAM CHETTY v. GUNAWARDENE


Sockalingam Chetty V. Gunawardene

Present : The Hon. Mr. J. P. Middleton, Acting Chief Justice,
and Mr. Justice Pereira.

SOCKALINGAM CHETTY v. GUNAWARDENE et al.

D. C, Colombo, 29,796.

    Partnership deed-Arbitration clause-Action for dissolution-Appointment of receiver.

The arbitration clause in a deed of partnership provided that if at any time during the partnership any dispute, doubt, or question should arise among the partners or their representatives on the construction of the partnership deed, or respecting the accounts, transactions, losses, or profits of the business, then such dispute, &c, was to be referred to the arbitration of two disinterested persons, one to be named by each party in dispute, &c.

Held, that such a clause does not enable a question of dissolution of partnership to be referred to arbitration.

Even where a Court has referred a question of dissolution to arbitration, it has the power to appoint a receiver.

THE plaintiff sued the defendants for the dissolution of the partnership existing between him and the defendants. The 13th clause of the partnership deed was as follows: " That if at any time during the partnership any dis














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top