MOHOTTE v. DISSANAYAKA et al.
Present: The Hon. Mr. J.
P. Middleton, Acting Chief Justice,
and the Hon. Mr. Justice Grenier.
MOHOTTE v. DISSANAYAKA et al.
D. C, Tangalla, 942.
Mortgage-Seizure of mortgaged land under money decree-Prior registration of
seizure-Mortgage unaffected-Form of mortgage decree.
A registration of a seizure of land under a money decree, in terms of section
237, Civil Procedure Code, does not affect a mortagage of the same land which
was executed by the judgment-debtor prior to the seizure, and which was
registered after the registration of the seizure.
A decree ordering specially mortgaged property to be sold in default of payment
of the money decreed to be due under the mortgage renders the mortgaged property
" bound and executable."
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Judge of
Tangalla. The facts are fully set out in the judgment of Middleton J.
H. A. Jayewardene, for first defendant, appellant.-Section 17 of Ordinance No.
14 of 1891 does not apply to seizures. The effect of registration of a seizure
is merely no render void, as against all claims enforceable under the seizure,
all private alienations, &c, after the seiz
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.