SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MOHOTTE v. DISSANAYAKA et al.


Mohotte V. Dissanayaka Et Al.,

Present: The Hon. Mr. J. P. Middleton, Acting Chief Justice,
and the Hon. Mr. Justice Grenier.

MOHOTTE
v. DISSANAYAKA et al.

D. C, Tangalla, 942.

    Mortgage-Seizure of mortgaged land under money decree-Prior registration of seizure-Mortgage unaffected-Form of mortgage decree.

A registration of a seizure of land under a money decree, in terms of section 237, Civil Procedure Code, does not affect a mortagage of the same land which was executed by the judgment-debtor prior to the seizure, and which was registered after the registration of the seizure.

A decree ordering specially mortgaged property to be sold in default of payment of the money decreed to be due under the mortgage renders the mortgaged property " bound and executable."

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Judge of Tangalla. The facts are fully set out in the judgment of Middleton J.

H. A. Jayewardene, for first defendant, appellant.-Section 17 of Ordinance No. 14 of 1891 does not apply to seizures. The effect of registration of a seizure is merely no render void, as against all claims enforceable under the seizure, all private alienations, &c, after the seiz































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top