WIJESOORIA v. IBRAHIMSA
Present : The Hon. Sir Joseph
T. Hutohinson, Chief Justice, May 16,1910
and Mr. Justice Middleton.
WIJESOORIA v. IBRAHIMSA.
D. C, Kandy, 19,291.
Minor-Contract-Sale of immovable
property-No sanction of Court obtained.
Although a minor cannot, as a general rule, bind himself by contract without the
authority of his tutor, yet, when he has, falsely represented himself to be of
full age, and has deceived the other contracting party by such representation,
he will be held bound.
A sale of immovable property without the sanction of Court by a minor who
represented himself to be of full age, was held not to be void under the
circumstances of this case.
THE
facts of this case are fully set out in the judgment of Hutchinson C.J.
A. St. V. Jayewardene, for the plaintiff, appellant.-Plaintiff was a
minor at the date of the conveyance; the conveyance was executed without the
sanction of Court, it is therefore void (Andris Appu v. Abanchi Appu,1 Perera v.
Perera,2 Manuel Naide v. Adrian Hamys). There is no estoppel in this case, as
the defendants were induced to purchase, not on any representation made by the
plaintiff, but owing to the af
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.