TAMBY v. UKKU BANDA
Sept.12,1910
Present : Mr. Justice Middleton.
TAMBY v. UKKU BANDA.
P. C, Gampola, 2,685.
Unlawful gaming - Common gaming place -
Proof - Definition of " gaming " under Village Committee rules.
It is open to people to play games of chance for money at their own houses
provided the house is not used as a common gaming place, or is not a place to
which the public has access whether as of right or not. Where there is no
warrant issued under the Gaming Ordinance strict proof should be adduced on the
part of the prosecution to show that the act charged is one which is an offence
under the Ordinance.
The use of a place on one occasion only would under certain circumstances
eititle a Court to say that it is a common gaming place; but there must be some
evidence, apart from the fact that it was used once for playing games for
stakes, which shows that it was in fact a common gaming place.
THE
facts are set out in the judgment
Bawa, for the appellant.
No appearance for the respondent.
September 12, 1910. MIDDLETON J.-
In this case the accused has been convicted, under section 4 of Ordinance No. 17
of 1889, of unlawfully gaming with cards for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.