MUTTU CAEUPPEN et al. v. EANKIRA et al.
Present : The Hon. Sir Joseph
T. Hutehinson, Chief Justice
and Mr. Justice Wood Renton.
MUTTU CAEUPPEN et al. v. EANKIRA et al.
D. C, Nuwara Eliya, 117.
Prescription-Possession by judgment-debtor
after Fiscal's sale for ten years-Adverse possession-Civil Procedure Code, ss.
289 and 291-' Deemed."
There is nothing in sections 289 and 291 of the Civil Procedure Code which
debars a judgment-debtor who has been in possession of the land sold for ten
years after Fiscal's sale, and before the execution of the Fiscal's transfer,
from claiming title to the land sold by prescription.
THE
facts are set out in the judgment.
A. St. V. Jayewardene, for the first defendant, appellant.-The judgment-debtor
continued to be in possession of the land sold for a period exceeding ten years
after .the sale by the Fiscal and its confirmation by the Court. The purchaser
at a Fiscal's sale, when the sale is confirmed by Court after the lapse of
thirty days, must procure his conveyance forthwith. After the sale, and until
the confirmation of the sale and the execution of the Fiscal's conveyance, the
judgment-debtor may use and enjoy the pro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.