SILINDUHAMY et al. v. MOHOTTIHAMY et al.
Present: Hutchinson C.J. and Middleton J. Feb.24,1911
SILINDUHAMY et al. v. MOHOTTIHAMY et al.
8-C. R. Ratnapura, 11,323.
Kandyan Law- Children by three beds-Succession among half-brothers and sisters-Per stirpes and not per capita.
A, a Kandyan, who was thrice married, died intestate, leaving him surviving one child S by his first wife, one child D by his second wife, and four children (plaintiffs) by his third wife. S died leaving two children (defendants). D, who inherited one-third share of A's estate, died intestate and childless.
Held, that the four plaintiffs were entitled to one-half and the two defendants to the other half of D's property.
THE facts are fully set out in the judgment of Hutchinson C.J. The case was referred to a Bench of two Judges by Van Langenberg A.J.
R. H. Morgan (with him Zoysa), for the plaintiffs, appellants, referred to the following authorities: Sawyer's Digest, pp. 9, 10; Perera's Collection, p. 124; Siriya v. Kaluwa;1 [(1899) 9 S. C. C. 45.] 2 Lorensz 27
No appearance for respondents.
Cur. adv. vult.
February 24, 1911. Hutchinson C.J.-
This case was referred to a Court of two Judg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.