SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL v. ARNOLIS ET AL.


The Attorney General V. Arnolis Et Al.

Present: Lascelles A.C.J.   April.6,1911

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL v. ARNOLIS et al.

196-P. C. Galle, 162.

Land at the disposal of the Crown-Land bought by the Crown for the default of payment, of grain tax-Ordinance No. 16 of 1907.

Land bought by the Crown for the default of payment of grain tax is " land at the disposal of the Crown " under the definition in Ordinance No. 16 of 1907.

IN this case the accused was charged with an offence under section 21, rule 1 (a), of the rules under chapter IV. of Ordinance No. 16 of 1907 (published in the Government Gazette of April 23, 1909), for having cultivated a field which the Crown had bought in when sold for non-payment of grain tax. The learned Magistrate (H. Beven, Esq.) acquitted the accused. The Attorney-General appealed.

Bawa, A. S.-G., for the appellant.-The Police Magistrate has omitted to note that the definition of land at the disposal of the Crown in section 3 of Ordinance No. 16 of 1907 is not exhaustive, but inclusive. It begins: " Land at the disposal of the Crown includes," and it is always open to the Crown to prove that a land though not of the description therein spe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top