SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

FERNANDO et al. v. MATHEW et al.


Fernando Et Al. V. Mathew Et Al.

Present: Middleton J. and Wood Renton J.

In re
the Estate of H. P. Fernando Wimalagoonewardene.

FERNANDO et al. v. MATHEW et al.

140-D. C. Colombo, 3,858.

Joint proxy in favour of one proctor by several executors-Application by some of the executors to revoke the proxy granted by them-Discretion of Court-Civil Procedure Code, s. 27.

Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Code invests the Court with a real discretion as. to whether or not the revocation of a proxy should be allowed

THE facts are set out in the judgment of Wood Renton J.

Bawa (with him H. A. Jayewardene and A. St. V. Jayewardene), for appellants,-A party has a general right to change his pleader. This section no doubt makes it necessary to obtain the leave of the Court for that. The Court will usually grant leave on the request of the party. See Hukm Chand's Civil Procedure Code,. vol. I., p. 493. James L. J. said in Ex parte Yalden,1 " A man has a right to change his solicitor if he likes, but then the law imposes certain terms in favour of the solicitor, that is to say, that the papers in the suit cannot be taken out of his hands without his having his costs paid "

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top