SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SCHRADER v. JOSEPH


Schrader V. Joseph

Present: Lascelles C.J. and Grenier J.

SCHRADER v. JOSEPH

469-C. R. Chilaw, 14,782.

Court of Requests-Money case-Absence of defendant when case called- Judgment for. plaintiff--Civil Procedure Code, s. 823.

In a Court of Requests, if a plaintiff fails to appear at the proper time, namely, at the hour fixed for trial, or when the case is called on, his action is liable to be dismissed, subject to his right under sub-section (5) to institute a fresh action, if he satisfies the Commissioner that he was prevented from appearing from accident, misfortune, or other unavoidable cause; and in the same way a defendant is liable to have judgment entered by default against him if he does not appear at the appointed time, or when the case-is called on. subject to his rights under sub-section (3) to have the judgment set aside on satisfying the Commissioner that he was prevented from attending by similar unavoidable cause.

Marikar v. Colombo Municipal Council1 and Hadjiar v. Kunjie2 over ruled.

THIS case was referred to a Bench of two Judges by Wood Renton J. The facts are set out by Wood Renton J. as follows in his judgment (February 26, 1912): -

This i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top