SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRICE v. SUPPAN


Price V. Suppan

Present: Lascelles C.J.

PRICE v. SUPPAN

267- P. C. Kandy, 28,436

Notice cancelling notice to quit-Must be given to employer, and not to agent of employer-Ordinance No. 13 of 1889, s. 3-Ordinance No. 9 of 1909, s. 20.

A notice by a cooly to cancel a previous notice to quit (like the original notice to quit) must be given to the employer (and not to his agent).

An " employer " is the chief person, for the time being, in charge of an estate, and includes the superintendent.

The question whether a person is or is not an " employer " within the meaning of the Ordinance is one of fact. It is not concluded by the circumstance that he was the Assistant Superintendent, and not the Superintendent, of the estate, for it may well be that an Assistant Superintendent is at a certain time the chief person in direct charge of the estate, and the only person in authority who is accessible to the labourers.

APPEAL with the sanction of the Attorney-General. The facts are set out in the judgment.

Grenier, for appellant.-Section 3 of Ordinance No. 3 of 1889 defines the term " employer " as the chief person for the time being in charge of the estate. Here Mr. Price,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top