SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

WORMAN &Co. v. NOORBHAI


Worman &Co. V. Noorbhai

Present: Lascelles C.J. and De Sampayo A.J.

WORMAN & CO. v. NOORBHAI

142-D. C. Colombo, 30,435,

Action on a foreign judgment-Is defendant bound by the judgment!

Plaintiffs obtained judgment against the defendant in the Court of Small Causes of Calcutta, but the defendant was not domiciled within the jurisdiction of the Indian Courts, and was not resident there at the time of the action against him, and did not appear to the process or agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the Court of Small Causes.

The plaintiffs subsequently sued the defendant in the District Court of Colombo on the judgment of the Calcutta High Court.

Held, that the defendant was not bound by the decree of the Calcutta Court.

THE facts are set out in the judgment of the District Judge (H. A. Loos, Esq.): -

The plaintiffs seek to recover from the defendant the sum of Rs. 2,282, which is the amount for which they obtained judgment against him in the Court of Small Causes of Calcutta in India.

The defendant pleads that the Calcutta Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the action against him, presumably meaning that the contract sued upon was made in Colombo, and that h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top