MODDER v. PERERA
[IN REVISION.]
1913 Present: Wood Renton J.
MODDER v. PERERA.
P. C. Colombo, 37,357.
An act which is an offence
under two or more laws-Conviction under one law-Application to Supreme Court to
quash conviction so that proceedings may be taken under the other law.
Where any act or omission constitutes an offence under two or more laws, the
offender shall be liable to be prosecuted and punished under either or any of
those laws, but shall not be liable to be punished twice for the same offence.
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
De Saram, C.C., for the Attorney-General.-The offence is one -punishable
under section 62 of the Post Office Ordinance of 1908 with seven years'
imprisonment. The Magistrate should not have, under the circumstances, tried the
case summarily under section
370
of the Penal Code. The
application of the Attorney-General is to get the proceedings quashed so that
non-summary proceedings may be taken against the accused.
There is nothing, however, to prevent the Attorney-General to take non-summary
proceedings against the accused even if this conviction remains. The plea of
autrefois convict would not be open to the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.