ELYATAMBY v. VALLIAMMAI
1913 Present: Lascelles
C.J. and Wood Renton J.
ELYATAMBY v. VALLIAMMAI et al.
222-D. C. Jaffna, 7,995.
Mortgage of an undivided
share-Mortgagee not registering address and not making puisne incumbrancer a
party to mortgage action- Subsequent action for partition-Mortgagee not entitled
to a declaration that the share mortgaged is subject to the mortgage-Civil
Procedure Code, ss. 643 and 644-Utilis impensa.
Compliance by a mortgagee with the requirements of sections 643 and 644 of the
Civil Procedure Code is a condition precedent to a puisne incumbrancer being
made bound either directly or indirectly by the decree in the mortgage action.
A mortgagee of an undivided share did not register his mortgage or his address,
in accordance with section 643, Civil Procedure Code, and did not make the
person to whom the mortgagor had subsequently gifted the land by an unregistered
deed a party to the
mortgage action. Under his decree
the mortgagee himself purchased the land. Thereafter a co-owner brought an
action for partition, and the mortgagee asked for a declaration that the title
of the subsequent donee was subject to his mortgage.
Held, t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.