SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

TIMES OF CEYLON v. MARCUS


Times Of Ceylon V. Marcus

1913 Present: Pereira J.

" TIMES OF CEYLON " v. MARCUS.

235-P. C. Colombo, 39,564.

Copyright telegram-Offence under a. 2 of Ordinance No. 19 of 1898- Prosecution need not establish, that the accused knew that the news had appeared in another paper-Burden of proof is on accused to show that publication was not wilful-Mens rea.

In a prosecution under section 2 of Ordinance No. 19 of 1898, where the intelligence contained in a message by electric telegraph, duly published in accordance with the Ordinance in a newspaper, is proved to have been printed and published by the accused within the prohibited tune, such publication can be excused only if it is shown that a message similar to that received by the newspaper and in like manner sent was the local source of such intelligence.

In section 2 of the Ordinance the word " wilfully " is not used in the sense of " knowingly."

Mens rea is not an ingredient of the offence defined in section 1. What the Ordinance means is that when a person receives intelligence that, humanly speaking, could only have reached Ceylon by means of the electric telegraph, it is his duty before printing and publ

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top