SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANAKULARATNA v. WICKRAMANAYAKE


Manakularatna V. Wickramanayake

1913 Present: Lascelles C.J. and Wood Renton J.

MANAKULARATNA v. WICKRAMANAYAKE.

42-D. C. Colombo, 34,245.

Husband and wife-Liability of husband for debts of wife-Ordinance No. 15 of 1876, s.10.

The husband is liable for the debts incurred by bis wife trading with his consent.

Ordinance No. 15 of 1876 (section 10) has not altered the common law with regard to the husband's liability for debts incurred by bis wife as publica mercatrix.

THE facts appear from the judgment.

H. A. Jayewardene (with him Arulanandam) for first defendant, appellant.-Section 10 of the Matrimonial Rights Ordinance has by implication repealed the Roman-Dutch law as to the liability of the husband for the wife's trade debts. Under the old law the husband got the benefit of the wife's earnings by trade; the earnings became part of the community. It was because of the community that the husband was liable for the debts. Under the present law there is no community; the reason for the husband's liability has therefore gone. [Wood Renton J.-Section 10 does not make any difference between those married in community and those married under the Ordinance of 1






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top