SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JOHN v. PERERA et al.


John V. Perera Et Al.

Present: Pereira J.

JOHN v. PERERA et al.

613 and 614-P. C. Negombo, 20, 090.

Bias-Magistrate also Superintendent of Prison-Trial of prison officer for negligently suffering prisoner to escape-Mere fact of escape it insufficient to give rise to presumption of negligence.

Observations on the inexpediency of the trial of. accused, who are subordinate officers of a prison and are charged with negligently suffering a prisoner to escape, by a Magistrate who is also Assistant Superintendent of the Prison, even though such trial is consented to by the accused.

In order to sustain a charge against a jail overseer and a jail guard of negligently suffering a prisoner in their custody to escape, it must be shown that the escape was directly due to some act of negligence on the part of the accused. The mere fact of escape is insufficient to give rise to a presumption of negligence.

THE facts appear from the judgment.

H. A. Jayewardene, for accused, appellants.

Garvin, Acting S. -G., for respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

September 12, 1913. Pereira J. -

In this case the two accused, who are an overseer and a guard, respectively, of the Negombo Jail, have be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top