KING v. PILLAI et al
1913 Present: Pereira J.
THE KING v. PILLAI et al.
117-120-D. C. (Crim. ) Kandy, 2, 394.
Indictment-Charge of voluntarily causing hurt to constable with intent to prevent arresting cooly quitting without notice-No mention in indictment of a warrant to arrest cooly.
Where an indictment charged the accused with voluntarily causing hurt to Police Constable M with intent to prevent him from doing his duty, to wit, arresting P on a charge of quitting service without notice, -
Held, that, on the face of it, the indictment (which made no reference to a warrant of arrest) disclosed no offence, and a conviction on it could not be sustained, nor would it be proper, in the circumstances, to amend the conviction and the indictment without giving the accused a further opportunity of defending himself on the amended charge.
THE facts are fully set out in the indictment.
H. J. C. Pereira (with him Arulanandam), for accused, appellant. - The indictment is defective, and discloses no offence known to the law. " Quitting service without notice " is not by itself an offence. Even if it is, it is not a cognizable offence. The indictment does not allege that th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.