SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GOVERNMENT AGENT SOUTHERN PROVINCE v. JAYASEKERA


Government Agent, Southern Province V. Jayasekera

1913 Present: Pereira J.

GOVERNMENT AGENT, SOUTHERN PROVINCE,
v.
JAYASEKERA.

302-C. R. Balapitiya, 9, 322.

Notice by Government Agent calling upon person owning land adjoining Crown land to make or renew boundary-May notice be signed by any other officer in his department ?-Ordinance No. 1 of 1844, s. 8.

Pereira J. -The statutory duly of issuing a notice in terms of the proviso to section 8 of Ordinance No. 1 of 1844 is expressly cast on the Government Agent or the Assistant Government Agent, and I doubt that the fact of such a notice being signed by an officer in the department of Government Agent or the Assistant Government Agent, even though he has official authority to sign notices generally on behalf of the Government Agent or the Assistant Government Agent, is a sufficient compliance with the requirements of the Ordinance.

IN this case the Government Agent, Southern Province, sues the defendant for the recovery of the sum of Rs. 69. 58, being double the cost of defining the boundaries of defendant's land called Polgahalanga at Batapola. The defendant sent a declaration to the Government Agent intimating h



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top