SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. CARUPIAH et al


King V. Carupiah Et Al

1914 Present: Pereira J.

THE KING v. CARUPIAH et al.

86-96-D. C. (Crim. ) Ratnapura, 1, 074.

Unlawful assembly-Common object-" Other offence "-Causing hurt- Penal Code, s. 138.

The expression " other offence " in section 188, sub-section (3), of the Ceylon Penal Code means an offence ejusdem generis with those expressly mentioned in the sub-section; and therefore, when the common object of an assembly was to commit an offence other than one in the nature of mischief or criminal trespass, the assembly could not be said to be an " unlawful assembly, " unless, of course, it would be such an assembly under the other sub-sections of section 188.

 THE facts are set out in the judgment.

A. St. V. Jayewardene, for appellants. -The offence of " causing hurt " cannot constitute the common object of the members of an unlawful assembly. The offence must be one ejusdem generis with those mentioned previously, viz., mischief and criminal trespass. " Causing hurt " does not come under the category. (See Muniweera v. Danta.[6 Tam. 78.]

Cooray, C. C., for respondent. -" Offence " is defined as anything made punishable under the Penal Code (see section 38

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top