GUNERIS v. KARUNARATNE
Present :
Pereira J. and De Sampayo A.J. 1914.
GUNERIS v. KARUNARATNE.
228-D. C. Negombo, 9,696.
Omission on the part of notary to search for registration of seizures before
drawing up conveyance-Action for damages against notary.
Where a notary follows a general practice and makes a mistake
regarding the strict requirements of the law as to which there is a
reasonable doubt, or where he commits an error of judgment, he is
not guilty of such negligence as would make him liable in damages
to his client.
Defendant, a notary, was sued by plaintiff for damages sustained by him by
reason of omission on the part of defendant to search for registrations of
seizures before drawing a conveyance of a certain parcel of land in plaintiff's
favour.
Held, per PEREIRA J.-That under section 29 (16a) of the Notaries Ordinance,
1907, it was the duty of a notary, before a deed or instrument affecting land or
other immovable property was drawn by him, to search or cause to be searched the
registers in the Land Registry, to ascertain, inter alia, whether there were
registrations of seizures (in execution) of the property dealt with by the deed
or instru
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.