VELANTHAN CHETTY v. SATHUKA LEBBE
1915. Present
: Wood Renton C.J. and De Sampayo A.J.
VELANTHAN CHETTY v. SATHUKA LEBBE.
20-D. C. Colombo, 40,106.
Action by way of summary procedure on note for Rs. 10,000-Endorsement on summons
wrongly stated to be Rs. 1,000-Is irregularity fatal to plaintiff's right to
proceed by way of summary procedure ?
In an action by way of summary procedure on a note for Rs. 10,000, in the copy
of the note endorsed on the summons the amount appeared both in words and
figures as Rs. 1,000.
Held, that the mistake was not fatal to plaintiff's right to proceed on the note
by way of summary procedure.
THE
facts are set out in the judgment.
F. M. de Saram, for appellant.-The summons in this case was not in
accordance with the strict requirements of section 703 of the Civil Procedure
Code. That section enacts that the summons shall be in the form No. 19 contained
in the second schedule to the Code. The form requires that the instrument sued
on. should be copied out, and where it is a negotiable instrument and carries
endorsements, that the endorsements should also be copied out. In the present
case the action is on a negotiable instrum
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.