SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KING v. PERIS et al.


King V. Peris Et Al.,

Present  : Wood Renton C.J.   1914.

THE KING v. PERIS et al.

174-175-D. C. Colombo, 3,847.

Unlawful assembly-Penal Code, s. 138-" Other offence. " not ejusdem generis with those immediately preceding.

The words "other offence" in clause 3 of section 138 of the Penal Code do not mean an offence ejusdem generis with those immediately preceding, namely, mischief and criminal trespass.

THE facts are set out in the judgment.

F. Obeyesekere, for the accused, appellants.

S. Obeyesekere, C.C., for the respondent.

November 19, 1914. WOOD RENTON C.J.-

This case raises an interesting question of law. The accused were charged, on a number of counts, with unlawful assembly, with the common intention of committing grievous hurt, and various kindred offences. They have been convicted and sentenced to heavy terms of imprisonment. The appellants' counsel has contended that the convictions on the counts of unlawful assembly are bad, inasmuch as the common intention alleged is to commit offences other than those specified in the various clauses of section 138 of the Penal Code, and in support of that contention he relies upon a decision of Mr. Just

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top