KING v. SUPPAR et al.
[FULL BENCH.]
1915. Present : Wood Renton C. J. and
Pereira and Ennis JJ.
THE KING v. SUPPAR et al.
56-61 D. C. (Crim.) Jaffna, 2,617.
Unlawful assembly-Common object--Voluntarily causing hurt-" Other
offence "-Penal Code, s. 138.
The expression "other offence" in section 138, sub-section (3),
of the Ceylon Penal Code does not mean an offence ejusdem generis
with those expressly mentioned in the subsection.
An intention voluntarily to cause hurt can constitute the common
object of an unlawful assembly. King v. Carupiah1[(1914) 17 N. L. R. 383.]
over-ruled.
THE
facts appear sufficiently from the judgment. The case was reserved for
argument before a Full Bench by Pereira J.
A. St. V. Jayewardene (with him Arulanandam), for accused, appellants.-The
common object set out in the indictment is causing
hurt. This is insufficient to support a conviction under section 188. The
offence of causing hurt is not one ejusdem generis with those mentioned in the
section. See King v. Carupiah1[(1914) 17 N. L. R. 383.]; also Tambyah's Penal Code 247 ; Tambyah's
Reports, vol. VI., p. 78.
Section 138 comes under chapter VIII, which deals with offences
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.